Talk: List of notable WADs

Revision as of 15:39, 12 April 2005

Questions / Critical comments

I'm not quite sure on your notation, does ☐ represent "starts only" i.e. yes, although not tested and not primary purpose? Also I'm not sure about the idea of marking things a "joke wad" since some things, for instance, Action Doom, could arguably be considered a joke wad because it's primarily an attempt at humor but at the same time enough effort was put into it that many people would say it wasn't. I'm curious what other people think. Sarge Baldy 15:56, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Yes, ☐ means that it works but it’s not meaned to be played like this. I think that for joke WADs, it should mark the WADs that fit in the article. Ducon 01:03, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)

That byte (or bytes) doesn't display properly in my browser. It seems the page is being sent as UTF-8 so it's probably kosher but maybe annotating in the ASCII subset would cause the fewest problems for people. I'll have a play with my OS encoding settings. Jdowland 07:46, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Does it look like a square? Its supposed to look that way :-)

What do you mean by "fit in the article"? Sarge Baldy 10:26, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 :Yes, ☐ means that it works but it’s not meaned to be played like this. I think that for joke WADs, it should mark the WADs that fit in the article. [[User:Ducon|Ducon]] 01:03, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)
 :: That byte (or bytes) doesn't display properly in my browser. It seems the page is being sent as UTF-8 so it's probably kosher but maybe annotating in the ASCII subset would cause the fewest problems for people. I'll have a play with my OS encoding settings. [[User:Jdowland|Jdowland]] 07:46, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)
+:::Does it look like a square? Its supposed to look that way :-)
 ::What do you mean by "fit in the article"? [[User:Sarge Baldy|Sarge Baldy]] 10:26, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)