Talk:Classic Rivalry

Nomination for deletion
Delete. The reason why I'm nominated Classic Rivalry for deletion is because of the poor reception and recent drama from the author himself. Other reasons include the fact that this wasn't notable to begin with and there are some YouTube videos and a moddb page. I personally feel that's not good enough for me to keep the page. The only reasons to keep or allow articles on bad mods are: 1. It won a Cacoward of some special side award. 2. Is historically important or 3. Is by an infamous/famous author. Justice ∞ (talk) 23:44, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * Having read the above thread from the given start point to the end, I agree that this should be deleted — it's nothing but a very badly designed WAD (over 250Mb in size, most of which is music) which is not worth the effort of downloading it, and was perhaps made that way because of the author's desire for self-promotion. It was probably because it was so apalling that somebody added it to the "Joke WAD" category, but it's not a joke WAD, it's just a bad one. — RobertATfm (talk) 09:42, April 30, 2013 (UTC)

One week later, no opposing opinions as to why this page should be kept. With Manoftron replacing the original video of which I had to re-upload because when I tried to restore it to the first video, I would instead get an image. Instead he could of nominated the article for deletion and explained why then I would probably supported his reasons. Then there's someone who added the self promotion screenshots of the author promoting Classic Rivalry on 4chan. The article and my re-upload of the original video has been deleted. Justice ∞ (talk) 23:21, May 6, 2013 (UTC)