Talk:Tei Tenga

Found this:


 * What is Tei Tenga?


 * Since Tei Tenga displays characteristics that are incompatible with planetary and gravitational physics numerous conjectures, theories and hypothesis have been proposed as to what the real nature of Tei Tenga is.


 * Evidence suggests Tei Tenga is not a normal celestial body, but that it is a planet sized autonomous entity. The celestial body has an atmosphere and extensive cloud formations without any percievable body of water, making underground aquifers the only possible source of the required moisture. Fossils of giant creatures have been found, pointing to a past teeming with life. These two facts are inconsistent with each other, abiogenesis theory, and developmental and evolutionary theories. Further, Tei Tenga's massive magnetosphere is evidence of a huge dynamo at the core, which is inconsistent with Tei Tenga's tidally locked orbit.


 * The only hypothesis that can explain these inconsistencies is also the only one to gain somewhat wide acceptance amongst specialists on the subject; the hypothesis states Tei Tenga is not an inert celestial body but a life form, based not on carbon but on iron. The entities encountered in the form of demons are in fact entities created by Tei Tenga itself to drive off the beings that are parasiting it, being the humans that are mining Tei Tenga. Being a planet sized, iron based life form and operating on electricity, it would be a trivial matter for Tei Tenga to scan the brain waves of the "messianic" scientists and extract blueprints for the innermost demons from their subconsciousness. It would further be a trivial matter for Tei Tenga to recreate these various demonic entities with magnetic fields and matter from the crust, the so called Fire Dust, and to then use these agents to drive off the current parasites. It has been suggested this has happened before and the fossils found on Tei Tenga are, in fact, evidence of this.

Should this be inserted? It's consistent with physics, at least. 128.214.133.2 13:16, October 27, 2009 (UTC)


 * Obviously, that question can't be answered until you say where you got it.  :>     Ryan W 17:29, October 27, 2009 (UTC)

Heh, they're parts of a txt file with a .doc extension on an old floppy w/ WADs from 1994/5.. I corrected the speling erors and pieced it together (tbh, I added the "fire dust" part), whoever wrote it doesn't have English as their 1st lingo. The text file is from 1999, it seems; I cud be wrogn. It's not like this is a "real" Wiki, anyways. ;) 82.181.94.185 22:38, October 27, 2009 (UTC)