File talk:DoomGraph.png

Licensing
In the past, we have argued that all original *text* must be contributed under the GFDL or not at all (see for example here). Does that apply to images also? Ryan W 19:11, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * If images are included then every screenshot, logo, map view would have to be deleted. It is impractical. Also Doom Wiki:Copyrights says that images can be fine and stuff, I did upload my own image. 68.197.167.110 16:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Last post is me BTW GhostlyDeath 17:02, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The key word above is "original", which is not the case for these three examples. A screen shot from a particular game is a one-of-a-kind artistic work, so we have to use it, or else have no illustration at all.  Conversely, anyone could create a chart very similar to this one (the facts themselves are "free"), release it into the public domain, and then argue that it is superior because it reduces our dependence on fair use material.  The policy about text is in the terms of use and therefore non-negotiable, so I think it makes sense to ask if it extends to images when a non-copyrighted alternative is available.


 * I am aware that image licensing issues are often ignored on Wikia's pop culture sites. I merely wondered what people's opinions were (obviously you have a strong opinion because you made the image).    Ryan W 22:07, 10 January 2009 (UTC)


 * IMO it's unacceptable. If GhostlyDeath isn't prepared to follow the normal licensing rules that we apply to content on this website, the image should be removed. Fraggle 12:58, 12 January 2009 (UTC)