User talk:Justice Infinity

Hi. Thanks for trying to start a discussion about new leadership. I've given you the rights. Good luck with the wiki! -- Wendy (talk ) 18:04, June 23, 2012 (UTC)

sorry, accidentally posted a comment on wrong wiki...

Recently the wiki had to deal with an vandal going under different ip addresses. If you are somehow interested, then check out the discussion July 2012 Drama. Justice ∞

Dear Justice infinity,
Okay you seem'ed to ask why we Deleted the old title screen picture and replaced it with a new one??? or am i wrong? And if i am wrong then please reply and explain more complicated what you exactly mean.

And about the old youtube poop doom title screen. Its not anymore in use of our mod and can be used for any mods. But one thing is sure. We are not gonna use it again.
 * No I was referring to the current title picture that didn't get linked to a page right away. In the future it's best to sign your posts with 4 tildes (~). Justice ∞ (talk) 17:41, August 4, 2012 (UTC)

Message from Wikia staff
A Wikia staffer called Wagnike2 has left a message on my talk page concerning a possible add-on for this wiki. Why he did so on mine and not yours, I don't know. -- RobertATfm (talk) 18:51, August 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * The question is do we really need such an add on? That depends on what you think about the add on itself. It would be interesting on what kind of related videos would be featured on this add-on. Justice ∞ (talk) 19:34, August 10, 2012 (UTC)

i have some information.
i noticed you just deleted

http://doom.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:TWVogels?s=wl

for some strange reason he has a link in his sig on Revolution Wikia, see the link on my talkpage for example. i don't know if this is wiki wide for this user of not but it does appear strange to me and i thought you should know so you can keep an eye on him. Wingman1 02:56, September 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * I deleted his talk page because, one he's not an member of the Doom Wiki, and two because it had nothing to do with the wiki so that's why I got rid of it. Well I suppose I can keep an eye out for him, but I don't see why this user would be a problem. Justice ∞ (talk) 04:45, September 22, 2012 (UTC)

Spiff Up
Oh hey Justice! I'm sorry, I must have missed you there on that admin list. My plans aren't all that complicated. I thought I would add some visual elements to the front page, like a slider. I'd also like to make a skin and implement the incoming Improved Nav Bar early to get it looking good. That's really all I had in mind. If you had something you wanted me to work on in particular, I can do that too. Also, if you would prefer, I can make a skin in a sandbox so you can approve of of it first. Let me know what you think is best.

Jorge (profile)•(talk) 22:10, September 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * How about trying to make a skin inside the sandbox just to see how it looks? Justice ∞ (talk) 22:20, September 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * Cool, I'll do that. Jorge (profile)•(talk) 16:34, September 28, 2012 (UTC)


 * Ok. I made up a quick skin. You can find it in my sandbox: http://jorgesandbox.wikia.com/wiki/Jorgesandbox_Wiki. Let me know if you like it enough to use it. If not, no worries. Also, let me know if you'd be interested in me adding the improved navigation feature. It will be coming soon for all wikis anyway and I can touch it up to make sure its ready for it and is easily navigable.
 * Jorge (profile)•(talk) 21:03, September 28, 2012 (UTC)

Heyheyehey.....
Ummmm Please justice infinity don't delete the youtube poop doom page. We just forgot a couple of months to update it. I'll Promise THIS Week it will be totally newed-up. Please don't delete it. The WAD is still in development.

Re:Your WAD
okay okay......... I know it was almost like a gaming ad :/ But the only reason I did that was becuase in the hope You'll won't delete my page. But yea sure. I'm maybe gonna make an page of it on the zdoom forums.

But what should I remove/improve to keep this page on this wiki?
 * Posting here because this is where the thread started. I for one don't believe in playing "wiki tennis" where user A posts on user B's talk page, user B replies on user A's talk page, A posts another reply on B's page, and then perhaps user C chips in, requiring everyone following the debate to be going back and forth between three talk pages... far simpler, and less confusing, to keep it all on the one page where it started.


 * I wonder about Theqmayn; I've had to do a massive cleanup on the Youtube Poop Doom page, first because of two instances of the spelling/grammar error "main protogonist[&zwj;sic]" instead of "protagonist", and in correcting these I noticed that all the article links were in external format despite going to articles on this wiki. There was no need for this, since (1) formatting inside the brackets can also be applied to internal links, and (2) if (as in these cases) the entire link text is to have the same formatting, this can (and should) go outside the brackets. Between this and Theqmayn's persistent failure to sign his posts (which is a simple matter of typing four tildes, or of clicking the "signature" button at the top of the edit window), I suspect that he needs to study Wiki formatting a bit more. Also, perhaps, to switch to the source editor if he's not already using it; I cannot recommend the visual editor, it leads to far too many mistakes such as inserting infoboxes into the middle of words and including pointless crap formatting with copy-pasted text. -- RobertATfm (talk) 23:23, October 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * I suppose I could keep the rest of the debate on my talk page. Since the article in question has been nominated for deletion, it should be discussed on the article's talk page and not here. I posted on Theqmayn's talk page because, when he logs in, he knows he's getting my message. Yeah so far he hasn't given me any good reasons as to why I should keep this article. Telling me stuff like, "what can I do to improve my article to make sure it doesn't get deleted", and begging me to not delete YouTube Poop Doom, are insufficient reasons as to why I should keep his article. The least I could do for Theqmayn was to give him some alternatives to self promoting his WAD. Justice ∞ (talk) 01:36, October 30, 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!
You are probably asking what da heck is this about??????? Well I've gotta say You send me the link with the user with the other youtube poop doom right???(YOUTOOHOO DOOM) I know that user on youtube. and my friend Cacodemontube saw his mod 2 years ago. He said he found it a piece of shit and that he could do better (His opinion not mine!) But at first instance Cacodemontube's wad looked poor. horrible sprites,graphics,textures etc. But I didn't tell him because I would know he would be mad at me if I said his mod sucked. So a month later I developed my own mod(Falcon doom) A very crappy mod either. It's just about random thing and it didn't make sense at all! (Now i'm happy this happened) 7 months later SlumpED give falcon.wad an IQ error. Everything was lost and I was very sad at that moment. I was almost going to give up doom! (Yes I did loved that shitty mod.) 2 months later I decided to ask Cacodemontube if I could help developing his mod. I added everything Decorate,Mapinfo etc. And I improved very much graphics and sprites. And BAM that's where youtube poop doom is born.

Why am I telling you this? Well I wanted to :)

So if Nicropods YOUTOOHOO doom gets popular. then youtube poop doom will sure get popular! If I'll post a forum of it on zdoom.

But still though. I hope this page of youtube poop doom keeps existing on this wiki. It's pretty fun to have your own mod on doom wiki :P

But if you say you are gonna delete it................. Well you're the admin.

P.S sorry for bad grammar. I was lazy at typing. Normally I can do better.

By theqmayn, Still don't know how to link to my account :(
 * I don't see how YOUTOOHOO Doom is going to get popular since the creator has abandoned the project. Regardless you still bring me no points as to why I should keep the article.  It's obvious that you can't come up with good reasons as to why I should keep your article, because all you could do is beg for me to keep YouTube Poop Doom.  The only information I could find about this instead of the article was someone's YouTube videos about this and the the ZDoom thread about somebody else's version of the same project. Justice ∞ (talk) 23:01, October 30, 2012 (UTC)

Possible bureaucrat action needed?
As you may have noticed from the Recent Changes, I&apos;ve just gone through all the old admin user and talk pages, adding to the top a Template:Inactive or Template:Longinactive as appropriate.

This seems to have worked without incident... except for User:Schneelocke, who replaced the template with a notice directing readers to the other Doom wiki. This of course I had to revert, since advertising forks here is a breach of the Wikia T&amp;C.

I think Schneelocke should be blocked for a month, and his admin rights revoked (at least for the duration of the block) so he can&apos;t just unblock himself. As I can&apos;t do the latter, it&apos;s down to you. -- RobertATfm (talk) 14:01, October 31, 2012 (UTC)


 * He&apos;s added the illegal notice again. he&apos;s also now saying "don&apos;t edit other people&apos;s user pages", to which my response is "don&apos;t tell admins how to run their wiki, especially if they&apos;re the current admins and you are not". A block is definitely called for. -- RobertATfm (talk) 14:07, October 31, 2012 (UTC)


 * Two other reasons have occurred to me as to why it&apos;s best that you do the block rather than I. Firstly, if I do the block it could be taken as vindictiveness, whereas if you do it it&apos;s clearly just wiki politics; secondly, I&apos;m feeling a bit angry about this (probably because, as of yesterday, my previously-favourite email provider has taken an abrupt nosedive in quality, so I already had something to be upset about). -- RobertATfm (talk) 14:46, October 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * Well the least I could do was take away his rights as admin. Personally I don't see any reason as to why I should block Schneelocke.  If he once again continues to advertise the fork to the other Doom Wiki, then yes I will take further action and block him.  Looking on the bright side he at least thinks this inactive template is a good idea. Justice ∞ (talk) 22:43, October 31, 2012 (UTC)