Talk:Eidolon


 * Old discussion moved to /archived. Please discuss the matter of this article's relevance at Central_Processing. -- Jdowland 18:09, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Relevance of this topic
Um... what exactly has changed since the 2006 discussions   to make Eidolon related to Doom, when it wasn't related then? Ryan W 01:00, April 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * The one point that could be made in favor of it now by opposition to then is that pages like Eidolon (Hexen) no longer exist and the information that was to be found there in 2006 has been entirely removed now. The other point (viz. "it's not Doom") still stands of course. --Gez 09:18, April 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * That's an argument for creating an article *somewhere* on Wikia. Here, for example.  There's also a Hexen Wiki.    Ryan W 17:06, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with the above. Move to the Hexen Wiki, then replace with link there. — RobertATfm (talk) 22:00, September 5, 2013 (UTC)

This page and the Hexen II page has been deleted a few times before because of the irrelevance that they both have for the wiki. I went ahead and nominated Hexen II for deletion based on irrelevance. Justice ∞ (talk) 00:00, September 9, 2013 (UTC)

A Week later, there have been no opposing opinions as to why Eidolon should be kept as an article considering this page has been deleted 4 times before in the past for the same reason, due to irrelevance to this wiki. I went ahead and did the samething with Hexen II since that article has the same reasons as Eidolon, and has been deleted 5 times before. If either of those articles are recreated in the foreseeable future, delete them on sight and don't bother with another discussion since it's the same reason as the previous admins have stated years ago. Justice ∞ (talk) 19:42, September 13, 2013 (UTC)